NewsFlash Daily™
07 April 
Nine-judge bench led by CJI Surya Kant re-examines 2018 verdict allowing women of all ages into Sabarimala temple, raising critical questions on religious freedom
New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has begun hearing review petitions in the highly sensitive Sabarimala Temple case, revisiting its landmark 2018 judgment that allowed women of all age groups to enter the shrine. The matter has now been placed before a nine-judge Constitution bench, marking a crucial phase in one of India’s most debated legal and religious disputes.
The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, is examining not just the review petitions but also broader constitutional questions related to religious freedom under Article 25. The case is expected to redefine the balance between faith-based practices and fundamental rights.
Background of the 2018 Verdict
In September 2018, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court ruled in favour of allowing women aged 10 to 50 into Sabarimala, breaking a long-standing tradition. However, the verdict triggered massive protests across Kerala, with several religious groups opposing the move. Justice Indu Malhotra had dissented in the original judgment, supporting the traditional restrictions.
Structured Hearing Schedule Announced
The court has laid out a detailed hearing schedule. Arguments supporting women’s entry are being heard from April 7 to April 9, while opposing arguments will be presented between April 14 and April 16. Rejoinders are expected by April 21, and the hearings are likely to conclude by April 22.
“The case raises vital constitutional questions that go beyond Sabarimala and touch upon the essence of religious freedom,” legal experts observed.
Linked Religious Freedom Cases Also Under Review
Alongside the Sabarimala matter, the apex court is also examining related issues, including:
- Entry of Muslim women into dargahs and mosques
- The rights of Parsi women married outside the community to enter fire temples
- Practices like excommunication in the Dawoodi Bohra community
- Legality of certain traditional customs impacting women
These cases collectively aim to clarify the scope and limits of religious autonomy in India.
Diverging Political Standpoints
The Kerala Government has supported women’s entry into the temple, while the central government has backed the continuation of restrictions. However, recent political developments suggest a possible shift in stance within the state, adding another layer of complexity to the issue.
Constitution Bench Composition
Apart from the Chief Justice, the bench includes Justices B.V. Nagarathna, M.M. Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, A.G. Masih, Prasanna B. Varale, R. Mahadevan, and Joymalya Bagchi. Their verdict is expected to have far-reaching implications on religious practices across India.
